Dao De Jing 11 – Duality of beingness vs. nothingness

Jan 31, 2012

—

in Chinese Philosophy, Daoism, Online Class

Thirty spokes, forms a wheel, together with the empty space within, yields the functionality of a car.

-> Ancient vehicle were run on wooden wheel, with 30 spokes connected to a circle in the middle of the wheel. The forms (spokes) and non-form (empty space of the circle) together yields the functionality of the wheel/car.

Clay when fashioned into vessels, together with the empty space within, yields the functionality of a vessel.

-> Form (clay) and non-form (empty space within vessel) together yields the functionality of a vessel.

Doors and windows when cut to form a room, together with the empty space within, yields the functionality of a room.

-> Form (doors and windows and walls) and non-form (empty space within the room) together yields the functionality of a room.

Therefore, beingness and nothingness together offers functionality.

-> Beingness (form) and nothingness (non-form) cannot be separated in its functionality and manifestation in the world. Can a wheel function as a wheel without the empty space in its center? Can a vessel be used to contain water if there is no space within? Can a room serve its purpose if it is filled? Similarly, empty space itself cannot do the job (of a wheel, vessel, room) without their corresponding form counterparts.

* * *

Chapter 11 Discussion:

Our mind likes to separate things into categories and opposites, as if the mentally separated subjects could exist independently. However, Laozi pointed out in this chapter, as a further elaboration to Chapter 2, with the 3 examples of wheel, vessel, and room, that it is a fallacy to separate our life into duality and opposites, and that separated and dualistic subjects do not have independent, stable and everlasting reality. Not only does the separation of form and non-form a fallacy to the perceptive world, it is also a fallacy to separate our own life into opposites. For example, in the classic duality of body vs. mind. Can the body be perceived without the mind? Can the mind exist without a body? The answer is obvious. Our life consists of both the body and the mind, which are two categories we created to describe certain aspects of our life (there is more, of course). What does it matter? It points us to perceive life as it is, beyond concepts and separation the mind created which does not stand at an objective and absolute level. It points us to go beyond duality and separation of the mind. It is the nature of higher truth, which when realized, liberates us from our ignorance, which is temporary, transitory, and illusive in nature. Therefore, in the Tai-Chi symbol, the black and white (or the yin and yang) are depicted separately yet are connected and united in the center to represent the highest truth of the world. Laozi did not teach Yin and Yang, he taught the truth beyond them.

Bilingual text of Chapter 11: http://www.lisiming.net/philosophy/chinese-philosophy/daoist/daoist-philosophy/dao-de-jing-core-33-chapters/ddj11-3/

center duality empty everlasting form ignorance illusion independent mind non-form objective opposites separation stable subjective tai chi temporary transitory yin yang

Comments

2 responses to “Dao De Jing 11 – Duality of beingness vs. nothingness”

妮基

2012-02-03

Master Li Si Ming,

Recognizing the non-dualistic nature of all that is, but at the same time living in a world where there are spokes and empty space that together comprise the wheel… Then in allegory to the path of the Dao, maybe it is best that the student be emptiness and allow the teacher (who or whatever that is) to take shape, be the spokes.

Perhaps it is best not to ask questions, but rather be quiet. Maybe asking is the easy way. Perhaps it is best, instead, to wait. To listen.

Is there truth in this? Could this practice serve as a self-imposed lesson in non-attachment, of ‘surrendering’?

Reply
1. derek
  
  2012-02-04
  
  The world comprises of different paradigms, and it could be confusing when different paradigms interact with each other and each speak its own view and language. Meeting an adapted teacher who can answer question, provide clarification and guidance is therefore a great convenience and blessing.
  
  The difficulty in questions is to ask the right question. Often one is in confusion and don’t know what to ask. On the other hand, when a blockage or paradox is contextualized into a question, it is already half of the answer and the answer will come in due time.
  
  Listening is important. It facilitates understanding and communication. It is also an expression of open-mindness and humility, which invites help and guidance in ones life. When you are truly listening, and following, you ask question or be quiet according to the natural flow of the universe, the paradox of the “either/or” does not arise and there is peace in either form.
  
  Reply